Editorial standards

War is uncertain.
The uncertainty should be visible.

This tracker is designed to be useful without pretending that contested casualty counts, classified budgets and fluid front lines are clean data.

01 · Scope

What counts as a major conflict?

There is no single universal threshold. We include a conflict when several of the following are true: sustained organized combat, high direct or indirect mortality, mass displacement, interstate involvement, systemic economic consequences, major-power risk or a humanitarian emergency. The list is curated, not exhaustive.

Battle intensityFrequency, lethality and geographic spread
Human impactDeaths, displacement, hunger and service collapse
Strategic reachAlliances, escalation and economic spillover
PersistenceAbility of armed actors to sustain operations
02 · Evidence

A source ladder, not source worship

Authority depends on the question. A finance ministry can be strong on its budget and weak on enemy losses. A humanitarian agency may be strongest on verified civilian harm but unable to enter occupied territory.

  1. Tier 1 · Direct recordsUN verification, audited budgets, official registers, treaty text, satellite-derived joint assessments.
  2. Tier 2 · High-quality synthesisReuters, AP, CFR, SIPRI, World Bank, ACLED and established research institutions with transparent methods.
  3. Tier 3 · Party claimsUseful when clearly attributed and cross-checked; never silently converted into fact.
  4. Tier 4 · Analytical inferenceOur conclusions and probabilities, explicitly labeled and never cited as if a source said them.
03 · Casualties

Why the tables do not always add up

“Casualties” can mean killed and wounded, while headlines sometimes use it as a synonym for deaths. Sources also disagree on civilians, police, militias, missing persons, repeat wounds and whether deaths from hunger or disease are direct war deaths.

Our ruleDated range + category + source + caveat

We do not merge incompatible windows or silently choose the midpoint of partisan claims. Verified minimums are not presented as complete totals.

04 · Maps

Strategic diagrams, not live targeting maps

The maps are original schematics based on public reporting. They generalize control zones, fronts, corridors, chokepoints and humanitarian pressure. They deliberately omit unit locations, coordinates and tactical detail. A point often means “this place matters,” not “a formation is located here.”

05 · Costs

Four different bills

1

Direct operations

Personnel, munitions, transport, maintenance and replacement.

2

Destroyed assets

Housing, industry, energy, transport and military equipment.

3

Lost output

Trade, taxes, labor, investment and displaced production.

4

Long tail

Reconstruction, veteran care, debt service and unexploded ordnance.

A national defense budget is not the same as a war cost. When it is the best available context, the dossier labels it as a ceiling or burden rather than attributing the whole amount to one theater.

06 · Forecasting

Scenarios, signals and calibration

Each dossier defines mutually exclusive near-term outcomes that sum to 100%. Longer horizons provide a base-case narrative because precision decays rapidly. Probabilities are judgmental estimates informed by force balance, political objectives, logistics, backers, geography, economic endurance and historical base rates.

InputsForce balance · objectives · endurance · external support
Alternative futuresDistinct, observable, time-bounded scenarios
Revision signalsEvents that should move the probability
HighMultiple independent, recent sources; limited definitional dispute.
MediumStrong directional evidence with meaningful gaps or conflicting claims.
LowSparse data, long horizon, hidden decision-making or unstable assumptions.
07 · Adversarial review

Where this product can mislead you

Map authority bias

A crisp shape can imply control that is fragmented by road, time of day or population. Read the map note.

Counting bias

Better-documented conflicts can appear worse than places where nobody can count safely.

Recency bias

A dramatic attack may shift attention without changing the underlying balance.

Outcome compression

“Win” can mean territory, regime survival, deterrence, legitimacy or bargaining leverage. Dossiers name the dimension.

Forecast anchoring

A percentage can feel objective. It is a disciplined opinion and should move when the signals do.

Source convergence

Multiple outlets may repeat one original claim. Ten links do not necessarily mean ten confirmations.

Read every number with its caveat attached.

The goal is not certainty. It is a clearer model of what is known, what is disputed and what would change the judgment.

Explore the dossiers